1. | Jan 9, 2018

WevIKg https://goldentabs.com/

2. | Dec 30, 2013

Finidng this post solves a problem for me. Thanks!

3. | Jul 22, 2013

Notes from the press conference [personal coetmnms are in square brackets]:Withdrawing because:1) RGGI not meeting the expected allowance cost of $20-$30 a ton originally envisioned. Current auction rates are less than $2.00 at the auction floorprice [$1.89 this year].2) NJ CO2 emissions are below the 2020 target. [I suggested the NH legislature should declare success, and say we don't need RGGI any longer. Doesn't seem to have registered.3) Other laws passed post RGGI specifically target development of renewable energy. [I hadn't thought of that angle, I rather like it.]4) RGGI is essentially a tax on electricity producers and passed on to the consumers.RGGI has provided no measurable environmental improvement. Since [neighboring] Pennsylvania is not it RGGI, it's conceivable that their dirty coal plants could put NJ's clean natural gas and other plants out of business.NJ will withdraw by year's end. [Like NH's bill, Christie noted it coincides with the end of the first three year "control period." Allowances are good for the control period they're assigned to and become worthless if not spent.]There will be no new coal plants in NJ. Christie referred to them as dirty.NJ will become #1 in offshore wind energy. [Umm, Okay. We'll be watching.][The recording ending before the end of the press conference. Grr. I may look for more.]

4. | Jul 22, 2013

Typo: burgeoning repel eftorfs I guess repelling C&T is part of the effort, but proximately repeal eftorfs are the issue. ;)As the new Sen. Brown is demonstrating, NE elects really mushy conservatives. It may be political necessity and expedience for them to continue to cater to Never-Neverland fantasizing, but it makes it real dangerous to give them more than limited short-term regional mandates.________As for NJ, in an immense irony there's a wee (Fed. gov't-disregarded) project there that may yank the economic rug out from under every renewables scheme on the planet. In about 5 yrs, maybe sooner. On the merest shoestring (~$2 M over 2 yrs) a little firm called Lawrenceville Plasma Physics has been consistently generating results that exceed those of the best eftorfs of any and all other (known, public) fusion programmes in the world. And they'd be far further along if they'd had adequate staffing and equipment resources.Current timelines will, it seems and I fervently hope, result in a viable licensable design for a mini generator (5MW) with a capital cost of about 5-10a2/KW, and a cost of production of about 0.3a2/kwh. (The output might rise to ~20-25 MW given adequate future engineering advances in cooling, which would slash those costs even deeper.) The size limitation (fully housed in a structure about the size of a home garage) is inherent in the design; scaling up would involve clustering or ganging them. But it would/will suck the economic life out of all the fantasy technologies; it goes them much more than one better on all counts. It's not even a radiation source; non-neutronic ( aneutronic') and hence no irradiated equipment etc. to cope with, and no waste other than stable neutral Helium-4. Over time, even coal, fission, hydro, etc. would be economic roadkill. It would/will change everything.LPP.comHere's hoping! All my fingers and toes are crossed. :)

5. | Jul 20, 2013

of taxes. e2809cTheree28099s not gonna be anybody in Trenton that can ovredire that.e2809d The first three tries werene28099t very encouraging, but maybe the fourth timee28099s the charm.fd3

6. | Apr 24, 2013

KUg1uA ekrkyjggddus