1. | Nov 16, 2013

Such outside daaaetsbs are useful, certainly for generating a comprehensive search function. However, that particular link lacks a few variations that we've found in our source material from 1890-1930, for example the ii ending, the ff in place of a v , and the apparent eo misspelling. While building a search function based on our source material and outside daaaetsbs will be invaluable, FLA is more intellectually interested in the potential analysis we might be able to conduct considering these variations. We might find trends in these variations through digital analysis that mirror political, cultural, or linguistic trends in the source publications, or we might not.Thanks for the comment!

2. | Nov 14, 2013

, decrees as peenrctage of total, while useful to know, still wouldn't tell the whole story, since it wouldn't tell us about whose laws didn't make the cut. And even if we had estimates of the latter which of course would be very useful there's always the case that the one thing that's crucial to somebody gets left out, because it seems too personal, temporary, or trivial (to later editors). In the end, it seems the basic unity of administrative, executive and legislative functions makes the whole idea of a complete collection very complex. Almost any imperial action could be law, it seems and then how could you collect or publish that? It's almost like the problem of the , rather than the problem of how to edit the complete Dostoevskii.It will be great to hear about your work in this venue I suspect that our projects have a lot of common issues between them.

3. | Nov 13, 2013

etot kurginyan soladt rothschildov! ego tozhe raskrutshiwaut w Rossii dlja psewdosozialisma po trotskomu (nowi tolpolitarism) i raswala Rossii (revoluzia kak eto uzhe bilo) Info pro kurginyana na KPE.  ru !!!Dmitri Slawoljubov ..wash bibleiski projekt w rasnowidnoi forme skoro prowaliza i washa psewdowlast (kapitalism, pwsewdosozialism gde toka elita rulit a ne narod..) isbrannix balnix skoro bolshe nebudet