1. | Jan 9, 2014

contdOf course the death peltnay deters. A review of the debate.Dudley Sharp 1) Anti death peltnay folks say that the burden of proof is on those who say that the death peltnay deters. Untrue. It is a rational truism that all potential negative outcomes deter some - there is no exception. It is the burden of death peltnay opponents to prove that the death peltnay, the most severe of criminal sanctions, is the only prospect of a negative outcome that deters none. They cannot. 2) There have been 28 recent studies finding for death peltnay deterrence. A few of those have been criticized. The criticism has, itself been rebutted and/or the criticism doesn't negate no. 1 or nos. 3-10. 3) No deterrence study finds that the death peltnay deters none. They cannot. Anti death peltnay columnists Eric Zorn of the Chicago Tribune states, "No one argues that the death peltnay deters none." Yes, some do, But Zorn is correct, the issue is not "Does the death peltnay deter?". It does. The only issue is to what degree. 4) About 99% of those murderers who are subject to the death peltnay do everything they can to receive a lesser sentence, in pre trial, plea bargains, trial, in appeals and in clemency/commutation proceedings. Life is preferred over death. Death is feared more than life. No surprise. Would a more rational group, those who choose not to murder, also share in that overwhelming fear of death and be deterred by the prospects of execution? Of course. 5) There are a number of known cases of individual deterrence, those potential murderers who have stated that they were prevented from committing murder because of their fear of the death peltnay. Individual deterrence exists. 6) General deterrence exists because individual deterrence cannot exist without it. 7) Even the dean of anti death peltnay academics, Hugo Adam Bedau, agrees that the death peltnay deters .. . but he doesn't believe it deters more than a life sentence. Nos. 4-6 and 10 provide anecdotal and rational evidence that the death peltnay is a greater deterrent than a life sentence. In addition, the 28 studies finding for deterrence, find that the death peltnay is an enhanced deterrent over a life sentence. 8) All criminal sanctions deter. If you doubt that, what do you think would happen if we ended all criminal sanctions? No rational person has any doubt. Some would have us, irrationally, believe that the most severe sanction, execution, is the only sanction which doesn't deter. 9) If we execute and there is no deterrence, we have justly punished a murderer and have prevented that murderer from ever harming/murdering, again. If we execute and there is deterrence, we have those benefits, plus we have spared more innocent lives. If we don't execute and there is deterrence, we have spared murderers at the cost of more innocent deaths. 10) Overwhelmingly, people prefer life over death and fear death more than life. "If we execute murderers and there is in fact no deterrent effect, we have killed a bunch of murderers. If we fail to execute murderers, and doing so would in fact have deterred other murders, we have allowed the killing of a bunch of innocent victims. I would much rather risk the former. This, to me, is not a tough call." John McAdams - Marquette University/Department of Political Science

2. | Jan 8, 2014

etot kurginyan sadolt rothschildov! ego tozhe raskrutshiwaut w Rossii dlja psewdosozialisma po trotskomu (nowi tolpolitarism) i raswala Rossii (revoluzia kak eto uzhe bilo) Info pro kurginyana na KPE.  ru !!!Dmitri Slawoljubov ..wash bibleiski projekt w rasnowidnoi forme skoro prowaliza i washa psewdowlast (kapitalism, pwsewdosozialism gde toka elita rulit a ne narod..) isbrannix balnix skoro bolshe nebudet

3. | Apr 27, 2013

3ajeeeb Emooooooo I can tell this is going to be one HECK of a controversial movie!! It's heart wanmrig to know we have so many bright minds in disillusion opposition to our crappy current status quo .. Way To Go EMMMAA Way To Go Miqdad AlKout!! *gives you both a standing ovation* ))))))))))))))))))))