Details » sanofreeslot
- Url: http://sanofreeslot.informe.com/
- Category: Gambling
- Description: It's not at all disrespectful to gamble with your money, because you can feel if you have a chance an sometimes, this power to stick to the dream pays more that anything else. The thing is, free slots sites give you the chance to enjoy and enter
- Members: 0
- Created On: Nov 22, 2010
- Posts: 0
- Hits: 25521
- Rating:
Post your rating:
User Comments:
1.
| Dec 20, 2013
Mark SkyrmeSeptember 10, 2012hi my activation is not winkorg can you help when I click on email link it takes me to the activate page but I have no code to enter many thanks Mark
2.
| Dec 13, 2013
I don`t really care what the rseoan for this pricing is. Maybe they really can`t pull off mass production of this sensor at rseoanable costs, as the Phase One technicians predicted. Maybe they got threatened with super expensive highly risky law suits for the reverse engineering of their mounts by Canon, Nikon and Sony and other makers- because they are afraid of an affordable SD1 coming before Nikon releases the D800 or Sony releases it`s own 40 Megapixel APS-C monster, the A770. One must think of things like this, way in advance.But Why don`t we show Sigma a way out of this situation?I could live with that SD1 price, if Sigma made me an offer that every serious medium format maker would make me Let`s take Mamiya / Phase One.If think of buying a Mamiya / Phase One 645 DF camera with a P45+ digital back, I pay the normal price (which includes a great worldwide professional service!)- and I get to choose 2 lenses for free.If I like to have the P65 Back, then I get 3 lenses for free. I can choose any 3 lenses- even the brand new, expensive but world class Schneider-Kreuznach leaf shutter lenses for this type of camera.The SD1 is no medium format camera. Resolution alone makes no professional medium format cam. It has an APS-C size sensor, no tethered shooting, no leaf shutter lenses, no worldwide professional service.But the price is in the medium format class.So, dear Sigma sales team.I kindly ask you to make me the same offer.I would buy the SD1 for the price stated- if you let my choose 2 or 3 lenses with the camera for free. And please, don`t make restrictions like those stupid kit offers from Sigma USA.Just offer me 2 options: I can choose 3 lenses, given the value of each lens doesn`t exceed let`s say 1200€, or I can choose 2 lenses when the value of each lens exceeds 1200€, and set an upper limit for this offer of a maximum lens value of 4500€.Something like that would be nice. I leave it for the sales team to do the math. As a pro, aware of the lack of reliability of Sigma cams from the past, I would have to buy 2 or even 3 bodies anyway- so that I can still get the job done in case one camera freezes entirely and another body suffers from sudden AF or exposure meter death, like it was the case with my other Sigma SDx`s in professional use I already have this great 17-50mm f2.8 OS lens, the 70mm makro, the 105mm makro. I like to have the 8-16mm, the new 50-150mm f2.8 OS and the new 120-300 f2.8 OS, plus the 4.5mm fisheye and maybe a 50mm lens (without those severe focus shift problems like the 50mm 1.4 HSM suffers from, which makes that lens basically unusable wide open, sorry Sigma, that`s true and even confirmed by Sigma technicians) that actually works, or a 30mm prime. Throw in a EF 610 DG Super flash, free with each body (you do know that Metz refuses to make adapters or flash units for Sigma cameras (after SD10) since they so tired of that Sigma-games you play), you got me back on the Sigma table again So, what do you say Sigma sales team?
3.
| Oct 16, 2013
My daughter, Pam Troyer, will be here from Apr. 29th to May 10th. She lives in Boston where she owns a Sonar and races and has tauhgt sailing.Is there anything she could be involved in while she is visiting in Sarasota?Actually, if you google Marblehead Sonar you will see her and her boat #492.Thanks Deane Bjork
4.
| Jun 13, 2013
aXdeTp ihcfofdwtswa
5.
| Jun 12, 2013
2AhaGn kqaunhwzualx
6.
| Jun 12, 2013
What distresses me the most about the Maureen Castriotta siutation is the way in which the BOE trampled her Constitutional rights. Also, the Board members have now opened us up to a costly law suit because they acted as authority above the Constitution of the United States and can now be officially recalled according to the BOE bylaws.The town lawyer did not read the all of Section 0146. Here is the pertinent part that was omitted at last night's meeting: Board members are entitled to express themselves publicly on any matter, including issues involving the Board and the school district. Individual Board members cannot, however, express the position of the Board except as expressly authorized, in accordance with the Board Policy No. 9120. A Board member shall not represent his/her personal opinion as the position of the Board and shall include in all formal expressions in which his/her Board affiliation is likely to be recognized, such as letters to government officials or newspapers, speeches to organizations and the like, a statement that the opinions expressed do not necessarily represent those of the board.She did not violate that part of the bylaws. According to the bylaws, she was free to express her opinion. It was malicious slander and nothing less. Regarding the walk out . First, it was authorized by Mr. Swanson and Dr. Rossi. They knew the day before that it was going to happen and they did nothing to discourage the students from doing it. This action, in itself, opens us up to any number of law suits. Most of those children were minors. As such, permission slips would be needed to excuse a student from class. I sincerely doubt that 600 permission slips were obtained. Secondly, a permit for lawful assembly was not issued to these students. Thirdly, the press was welcomed at the walk out which makes me believe that either Mr. Swanson or Dr. Rossi invited them to attend.Lastly, if the principal of the high school and the superintendent cannot MANAGE and exert their authority over their students, they are incompetent and should be DISMISSED immediately.Shame on Pat Miller who only stated the view point (and IMHO, a pack of lies) that Rossi and Swanson presented as truth etched in stone. Shame on those who voted to censure Ms. Castriotta. At the very least, she should start the recall procedure against the members of the board for trampling her rights.
7.
| Jun 11, 2013
YrS9Bo ihmwxapgybgv
8.
| Jun 10, 2013
Hh4xqB iwzopcpyehdg
9.
| Jun 10, 2013
You've rlleay captured all the essentials in this subject area, haven't you?
10.
| May 21, 2013
ixNOIq bhsddmfksmrr
11.
| May 19, 2013
vpFDY9 orxvlnbiivik
12.
| May 17, 2013
there are others but I wldoun't personally recommend them to you if I haven't tried it out myself in case of security and privacy issues, I will try to check others though and will post them in the description.
13.
| Feb 12, 2012
B9haFn Stupid article..!